This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This regulatory strategy leverages bioequivalence studies to expedite approval, positioning Gelteq’s gel as an alternative to traditional oral delivery forms. In the pharmaceutical segment, Gelteq advances its lead product — a gel-based pain management therapy — through the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s 505(b)(2) pathway.
For instance, the generic drug must be “the pharmaceutical equivalent of the [CRP]” and be “bioequivalent with the [CRP]”. According to the Notice, the alternate CRP is preferably another generic drug that has demonstrated bioequivalence with the “Dormant” innovative drug.
Unlike small-molecule generic drugs, biosimilars do not need to demonstrate bioequivalence to the innovator product. MYTH: Clinical pharmacology studies of biosimilars aim to establish safety and effectiveness.
Rather, the bioequivalence studies were performed using the 150 mg strength; and the data was extrapolated to the higher dose. Two doses, bupropion XL 15 mg and bupropion XL 300 were approved. Since the higher dose was associated with the risks of seizures, the FDA granted a waiver in its testing.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 21,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content