This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The approval was based on successful results from a bioequivalence study comparing Rizafilm to Merck and Co’s Maxalt-MTL and the European reference Maxalt-Lingua. IntelGenx Corp announced that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the company’s Rizafilm VersaFilm new drug application (NDA) for the treatment of acute migraine.
The ANDA must demonstrate bioequivalence to the Reference Listed Drug (RLD), which is the original brand-name drug approved for marketing in Japan. The PMDA evaluates the generic drug based on its chemical, physical, and biological characteristics, as well as its manufacturing process and quality control measures. Freyr Solutions.
With decreasing margins on the horizon, pharma manufacturers have long shown an interest in specialty generics, which is only expected to rise in the future. Despite this, specialty generics are expected to be the domain of a handful of companies with the necessary manufacturing capabilities and legal backing needed for entering the market.
Key Factors Influencing Generic Entry To identify branded drugs with a low likelihood of generic entry, it’s crucial to understand the factors that influence generic manufacturers’ decisions to enter a market. This complexity can serve as a barrier to entry for potential generic manufacturers.
To address growing demand, Gelteq is expanding production capacity with a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-certified facility, aiming for scalable, reliable output by 2025. This regulatory strategy leverages bioequivalence studies to expedite approval, positioning Gelteq’s gel as an alternative to traditional oral delivery forms.
A phone call to FDA requested information about the number of Remote Interactive Evaluations (RIEs) that FDA has performed at drug manufacturing facilities since it announced in April 2021 that it would start using them as an alternative to on-site inspections.
The Importance of Scientific Expertise Generic drug development involves a deep understanding of the scientific principles underlying drug development, including pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and bioequivalence. Bioequivalence Studies : Bioequivalence studies are a critical component of generic drug development.
For example, streamlined programs can be limited to literature searches, nonclinical studies, demonstration of bioequivalence to an approved product, or a combination of nonclinical and bioequivalence studies, and their relatively low costs may be appealing. Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) Strategies.
Pfizer and Merck have chosen to designate a select few generic manufacturers to produce cheaper versions of their drugs through the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP). Reportedly, the cost of production for molnupiravir stands at about $17.74. Experts across the board are predicting demand for antiviral drugs will rapidly outpace supply.
Case Study 1: Overcoming Formulation Challenges Let’s kick things off with a look at how generic drug manufacturers are tackling formulation challenges head-on. Generic drug manufacturers are taking a similar approach by developing multiple drugs simultaneously[1]. The bone of contention?
Once approved, the patent holder enjoys a period of exclusivity, during which generic manufacturers cannot enter the market. This is where generic manufacturers come into play. They must file an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with the FDA, which includes a certification that the generic drug is bioequivalent to the original.
It aims to ensure the quality of medicines by employing statistical, analytical, and risk-management methodology in the design, development, and manufacturing processes of medicines. Biosimilars are biologic medical products that almost exactly replicate products already being manufactured by other companies.
Nitrosamines are impurities that can form during drug manufacturing and are considered potentially potent carcinogens. For example, depending on the manufacturing process for a specific human drug, the use of some specific solvents, reagents, and catalysts may trigger the formation of these possible carcinogens.
Design validation may be covered by clinical studies, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic or bioequivalence/bioavailability studies, literature, simulated bench testing, and/or anthropometric data and should include endpoints that have the capability of validating device performance.
Sure enough, ConsumerLab.com discovered that the 300mg version was clearly not bioequivalent. Several years later, the FDA ordered bioequivalence tests and finally, through those results, which found, like ConsumerLab.com did, that the People’s Pharmacy was right, and forced the drug off the market. Compare Wellbutrin Prices.
A 351(k) application is a BLA process submitted by a manufacturer to get a product reviewed as a biosimilar or interchangeable, which is considered to be “highly similar” to an FDA-licensed reference product. The role of pharmacometrics for biosimilars is no less significant than for biologics.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) and bioequivalence (BE) studies serve as the foundation of determining the fate of drug products. Drug development is an extremely cumbersome process, requiring the testing of an agent from in vitro studies to in vivo studies to in silico modeling.
Zosano Pharma has been hit by an FDA rejection of its marketing application for migraine drug Qtrypta, asking for new bioequivalence data. Qtrypta is Zosano’s lead product candidate, but the company is also working on a follow-up in phase 2/3 for cluster headache.
Amphastar’s newly approved synthetic peptide product was determined by the FDA to be bioequivalent and therapeutically equivalent to Eli Lilly’s Glucagon Emergency Kit for Low Blood Sugar, which has a recombinant DNA (rDNA)-origin. Glucagon is indicated for the treatment of severe hypoglycemia and is also used as a diagnostic aid.
The company was slammed for restricting distribution of its drug so generic drug manufacturers couldn’t conduct bioequivalence tests or access a key ingredient used in the drug’s production.
Crucially, biosimilars manufacturers must also demonstrate that their product’s safety and efficacy profile won’t go down if a patient switches back and forth between the biosimilar and the reference product during the course of treatment. Because most biologics are mixtures of variants, they really can’t be copied exactly.”.
In addition, TLC is preparing for scale-up production of TLC590, as for complex lipid products, the manufacturing process and batch size used in pivotal clinical trials and New Drug Application submission must be the same as future commercial batches.
Onset of B-cell depletion with subcutaneous administration of ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: results from the APLIOS bioequivalence study. J Neurol Sci. 2003;206(2):165–71. 3. Bar-Or A, Fox E, Goodyear A, et al. Poster presentation at: ACTRIMS; February 2020; West Palm Beach, FL. 4. Hauser S, Bar-Or A, Cohen J, et al.
Although the active ingredient is the same, there are differences in non-active components (the core of the tablet and coating), which reflect both pills’ manufacturing process. As with other drugs, once a patent expires, other manufactures start to produce generic or new brands of the same pill (desogestrel). References: .
These agencies set guidelines and regulations that generic drug manufacturers must follow to ensure that their products are bioequivalent to the innovator drug. Regulatory agencies also conduct inspections and audits to ensure compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines.
The Notice advises that if an innovative drug is categorized as “Dormant” in Health Canada’s Drug Product Database, then a generic manufacturer can compare its drug against an alternate CRP, which could include another generic drug, when filing an Abbreviated New Drug Submission ( ANDS ).
The Science Behind Generic Drug Bioequivalence: Separating Fact from Fiction As a healthcare professional or someone simply looking to stay informed, you've likely heard the term "bioequivalence" thrown around when it comes to generic drugs. But what does it really mean, and how does it impact the medications we take?
One of the key tools that generic drug manufacturers rely on to navigate the complex regulatory environment is the FDA’s Product Specific Guidances (PSGs). They offer guidance on formulation development and manufacturing considerations. They provide recommendations on the design of in vitro and in vivo studies.
Once the patent expires, other companies can apply to manufacture and market generic versions of the drug. The ANDA must also demonstrate that the generic drug is bioequivalent to the brand-name drug. The ANDA must also demonstrate that the generic drug is bioequivalent to the brand-name drug.
The preparation of a semi-solid dosage form – from formulation and development, to scale-up, commercial manufacturing, and packaging – should ideally take place under one roof in a contiguous, end-to-end workflow to avoid unnecessary equipment and process changes. In vitro release testing to demonstrate bioequivalence.
The BCS is a regulatory tool that is used to justify clinical biowaivers for certain types of compounds (BCS Class I and III) based on dissolution data, allowing sponsors to justify not performing clinical bioequivalence studies when changing a formulation.
India’s vaccine shortage will last months, biggest manufacturer warns ( FT ).
Korea To Toughen Co-Bioequivalence Study System Amid Generic Quality Issue ( Pink Sheet ).
Korea To Toughen Co-Bioequivalence Study System Amid Generic Quality Issue ( Pink Sheet ).
Coronavirus Pandemic.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 21,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content