This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
New research from ETH Zürich in Switzerland could see future wearable devices (with perhaps a few implants and a touch of geneticengineering) boost our health directly. Fitness trackers help you stay healthy by keeping count of your steps and monitoring your heart rate, driving you on to hit those cardio goals.
When working with an unfamiliar IP, clinical personnel are likely looking for answers to three main questions: What are the risks associated with this IP? Replication-incompetent Agents Many viral vectors used in clinical trials today are geneticallyengineered with safeguards to render them replication-incompetent.
Gene therapy research is exciting and full of promise, but because of the risks involved, it’s also highly regulated, requiring an institutional biosafety committee (IBC) to provide additional oversight and risk assessment. IBC membership must include involving two local community members who reside within 50 miles of the research site.
This trend came to the forefront during the COVID-19 pandemic, as the three most popular vaccines developed in response to the coronavirus contained engineeredgenetic materials in the form of mRNA or a geneticallyengineered virus.
As Nick Spittal states in this Advarra press release, membership in the Gene Therapy Ready (GTR) site network “allows Velocity to start studies over a month faster and provides a meaningful credential and important validation that increases sponsors’ confidence in our specialized capabilities to conduct complex clinicalresearch safely.”
The NIH Guidelines also stipulate that at least two members of each IBC come from the surrounding community and be unaffiliated with the institution where the research is occurring apart from their membership on the IBC. Many of those original concerns of the 1970s and 1980s surrounding geneticengineering have lessened over time.
Risks and Regulatory Requirements Most clinicalresearchers are familiar with the regulatory requirements pertaining to the FDA phases of review as well as with IRB review. IBCs are comprised of at least five members, including at least two unaffiliated community members.
At the time this change was implemented, methods used to deliver rsNA to cells or research participants typically involved the use of viral vectors that were subject to the NIH Guidelines. Since then, however, certain geneticengineering technologies (e.g.,
The complexities in clinicalresearch in both Clinicalresearch for both biologics and small molecules involves complex processes that are crucial for demonstrating safety, efficacy, and quality before obtaining regulatory approval.
The applications of mRNA-based therapies in cancer research represent one of the next groundbreaking steps toward improved cancer treatments. While mRNA usage has played several roles in clinicalresearch , oncology researchers in particular are eager to explore the possibilities of mRNA-based cancer vaccines.
This will aid clinical development and preparation for investigational new drug (IND) and biologics license application (BLA) submissions. The project should also help clinicalresearch sponsors take advantage of various FDA pathways for accelerated review and approval.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 21,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content