This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
CPhI awards the first ever CPhI Verified certificate to Medinfar – an international pharmaceutical manufacturer of Rx, cosmetics, food supplements and veterinary products. The service forms part of the platinum membership on CPhI Online and is designed to further supply.
The cosmetics and personal care industry is one where customer trust is paramount, given that the products are applied directly to the skin, hair, and body. This integration provides a holistic view of product safety, from manufacturing through post-market surveillance.
The 21 st Century Cures Act generated a good deal of excitement and interest when it added a section called “ Utilizing Real World Evidence ” to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Section 505F). FDA Publishes ICH Guidelines on Continuous Manufacturing. FDA Guidance Addresses Real-World Evidence Data Standards.
This applies to electronic data and signatures submitted under records requirements under other regulations such as: Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Many companies use good automated manufacturing practice (GAMP), while others choose to focus on the Part 11 requirements and write validation procedures for their company to follow.
In October 2014, FDA held a public workshop titled “Additive Manufacturing of Medical Devices: An Interactive Discussion on the Technical Considerations of 3D Printing.” This discussion paper is not the first time that FDA has grappled with the tricky regulatory questions presented by 3D printing. products intended for medical purposes).
By Faraz Siddiqui — As drug manufacturers battle the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) in federal courts over the role of 340B contract pharmacies, an Eighth Circuit decision to uphold a 2021 Arkansas law may render those cases inconsequential in that state. 23-92-604(c)(1), (2) (Act 1103). & Mfrs.
FDA Inspections - Overview admin Thu, 02/02/2023 - 13:52 FDA Inspection is a regulatory process conducted by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate the compliance of food and drug establishments with FDA regulations and standards.
Of particular concern was a component in the previous iteration that placed product sponsors at a potential compliance risk if the sponsor simply had knowledge of an off-label use of their product. The skinny label approach has been used extensively by generic manufacturers since it was enacted via the Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984.
In October 2014, FDA held a public workshop titled “Additive Manufacturing of Medical Devices: An Interactive Discussion on the Technical Considerations of 3D Printing.” This discussion paper is not the first time that FDA has grappled with the tricky regulatory questions presented by 3D printing. products intended for medical purposes).
The American Conference Institute (“ACI”) will be hosting a series of go-to forums on critical topics including novel therapeutics, cosmetics/personal care products and Paragraph IV disputes. Claud will be featured at the Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Forum on Cosmetics & Personal Care Products in New York, NY.
With the approach of the January 1, 2022 mandatory compliance deadline for the BE standard, manufacturers and importers of food and dietary supplements should work to develop strategies for compliance and evaluating each product’s bioengineered (BE) status if they have not already done so.
Food and Drug Administration – labeled an “Official Action Indicated” classification – is generally devastating for the facility, not least because it can stall FDA approval of applications to market drugs manufactured at the facility. We are not aware of a similar guidance for meeting requests from manufacturers of NDA drugs.
During a drug shortage, compounders might be allowed to prepare a compounded version of the drug provided they meet specific requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act. Novo Nordisk, the pharmaceutical manufacturer of Ozempic and Wegovy, is actively addressing these supply challenges.
To help ensure compliance, it is advisable for companies to establish procedures to assess and verify IT security of social media and digital channels, and to review and monitor company activities, content, and materials. About the authors.
It is very common for a medical device manufacturing facility both to be certified as compliant with ISO 13485 and to have quality system procedures designed to comply with the FDA’s QSR. The gap between QSR requirements and ISO standards has created confusion for companies that focused compliance only on ISO certification.
Gibbs — For more than three decades, FDA has claimed that the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic (FD&C Act) gives the agency legal authority to regulate laboratory developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices (see our prior post here ). Lenz, Principal Medical Device Regulation Expert & Sophia R. Gaulkin & Jeffrey N.
It is intended to reduce regulatory burdens on medical device manufacturers and importers by enhancing global harmonization in device regulation. It also specifies that manufacturers document the Unique Device Identifier (UDI) for each medical device or batch of medical devices in accordance with Part 830, Unique Device Identification.
Baumhardt provides counsel to medical device, in vitro diagnostic, and combination product manufacturers on a wide range of pre- and post-marketing regulatory topics. Baumhardt advises clients on complaint handling, MDRs, Quality System Regulation compliance and enforcement matters. In the pre-market area, Ms.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft update to its Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) for FDA staff on the Agency’s enforcement of major food allergen labeling and cross-contact. By Sophia R. Gaulkin & Riëtte van Laack — On May 16, the U.S.
Section 804 Importation Programs On October 1, 2020, the FDA published a rule entitled Importation of Prescription Drugs (the US Importation Rule ) to implement Section 804 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Biologics, controlled substances, and certain other drugs are not eligible for importation.
The compliance policies described in the Guidance focus on the requirement that, beginning November 27, 2023, all trading partners generally will be required to use electronic-based approaches to meet the enhanced drug distribution security requirements set forth in in FDCA section 582(g)(1) (Enhanced Drug Distribution Security).
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDC Act) requires that all animal foods, like human foods, be safe to eat, produced under sanitary conditions, contain no harmful substances, and be truthfully labeled. By Riëtte van Laack — FDA regulates pet food similar to other animal foods.
In 1997, the de novo classification process was added to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) by the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997. In the PMA context, the statute permits FDA to withhold approval if manufacturing facilities do not conform to QSR requirements. Part 807, Subpart E). 515(d)(2)(C).
The crux of the proposed rule lies in the addition of ten words: “ including when the manufacturer of these products is a laboratory.” These words would be added to the definition of “ in vitro diagnostic [IVD] products” in 21 C.F.R. This timing undermines the Agency’s rationale that three years is enough time to come into compliance.
This is important because self-fitting hearing aids require the submission and clearance of a 510(k) while regular OTC hearing aids do not, which provides incentive for manufacturers to self-classify their hearing aid products as regular OTC rather than self-fitting. (FYI,
an animal food manufacturing company of Carney’s Point, New Jersey, has agreed to stop selling, manufacturing and distributing raw pet food and come into compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced today that Bravo Packing, Inc.,
Perhaps FDA wanted us to remember 2023 as the year FDA succeeded in uncovering critical defects in drug and device manufacturing, and in critical trials. Warning Letters, generally made public in a batch each Tuesday, are FDA’s public sanction that is most widely used to bring pressure on manufacturers and clinical trial investigators.
In response to the recall, the FDA lately conducted an examination of a Philips Respironics’ manufacturing installation to determine what may have caused or contributed to the froth issues and assess adherence to the agency’s conditions for quality manufacturing. The FDA investigator handed a list of their compliances to the company.
As we outlined in the Closer to Zero action plan, the agency is increasing targeted compliance activities as part of our efforts to monitor levels of these elements in foods through the FDA’s Total Diet Study , Toxic Elements in Food and Foodware program and sampling assignments,” said Susan Mayne, Ph.D., Source link: [link].
The pCPA negotiates with manufacturers on behalf of Canada’s provincial, territorial, and federal governments. Case law updates In 2023, the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations ( Regulations ) turned 30 years old, inspiring our litigators to consider how the Regulations have evolved since 1993 (see here ).
FDA’s jurisdiction over OTC monograph drug labels is clear, but some courts seem to believe that compliance with the label requirements set forth in the relevant monograph is not only not sufficient, but also is discretionary, implicitly chipping away at the authority of the agency. Just like it was over a decade ago in Pliva v.
The American Conference Institutes 12th Annual Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Forum on Cosmetics & Personal Care is scheduled to take place from March 27-28, 2025, at the New York City Bar Association, New York, NY. FDA Law Blog is a conference media partner. As such, we can offer our readers a special 10% discount.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given authorization to Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration’s drug importation program under section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). This means Florida could soon import select prescription drugs from Canada.
If these proposed rules are finalized and implemented, FDA enforcement will only address manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, importers and retailers who manufacture, distribute, or sell such products within the U.S. that are not in compliance with applicable requirements. Source link: [link].
deputy director of the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) Division of Compliance: “Although this pet food recall is still unfolding, we are sharing the facts we have so far because the levels of aflatoxin found in the recalled pet food are potentially fatal. SILVER SPRING, Md. ,
This is an ongoing investigation.
By Ritte van Laack A little over two years ago, the Modernization of Cosmetic Regulation Act (MoCRA) was (at long last) enacted. Excitement that after about a decade the FDC Act finally was amended giving cosmetics more legitimacy; anxiety because MoCRA seemed a substantial change for many involved in the business of cosmetics.
HTC/Ps in this last category are regulated as drugs or medical devices under the FDCA, or biological products under section 351 of the PHSA, which typically require premarket approval and compliance with the full panoply of FDA regulation. California Stem Cell Treatment Center, Inc.,
Rather than creating its own importation program under Section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDC Act), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) used the statute to create a pathway for States and Indian Tribes (“Sponsors”) to develop such programs (called Section 804 Importation Programs, or SIPs).
Kirschenbaum — The law permitting the importation of cheaper prescription drugs from Canada—Section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDC Act)—has been on the books for decades. By Faraz Siddiqui & Alan M. See 21 C.F.R. 251.5; § 251.6(c). Proposed relabeling and proposed NDC numbers for the drugs to be imported.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 21,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content